Transformative Use is Useless
January 27, 2012 at 11:10 am Leave a comment
‘Transformative use’ is just mucking things up.
That’s what I think.
Providing a pivot for the Cariou v Prince case and the only real point of interest no matter what the pundits say, transformative use, instead of the fog-clearing test that it was supposed to be, has become the main particulate in a legal fog of war that has lasted three years now.
Thus far, the dueling Cariou v Prince briefs have added new certainty to my theory that transformative use is a singularly unhelpful notion.
Read the rest on Hyperallergic
Entry filed under: art/law, OPINION. Tags: Anthony Falzone, Art, art law, Cat, Cat Weaver, copyright, Copyright law, Dan Brooks, fair use, Gagosian Gallery, Hyperallergic Magazine, IP law, painters, painting, Patrick Cariou, photographers, photography, Richard Prince, The Art Machine, transformative use, Virginia Rutledge.
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed