Maybe it’s MGM’s Banana?
February 27, 2012 at 6:11 pm Leave a comment
Everybody Has a Sticker on This Banana! Graphic by Cat Weaver :)
Following up on the Velvet Underground v The Andy Warhol Foundation story, Hollywood Reporter speculates similarly to The Art Machine that the famed fruit’s copyright may belong to the record label.
Hollywood Reporters’s Eriq Gardner, wondering why the Velvet Underground hasn’t used a more fail-proof strategy of claiming the copyright for themselves (instead of opting to claim trademark protection on an image in the public domain) says,
“According to the facts in record, MGM Records paid both the band and Warhol $3,000 to furnish the image for use on the 1967 album cover. If the record label paid the money as a work-for-hire agreement, the true “author” of the image, under the law, would be the record label. We asked Universal Music Group, the seeming successor to MGM Records, to comment, but so far, we haven’t heard anything.”
It is an interesting speculation and one we may wonder about: is MGM silently planning its own little coup? And, if so, was it inspired by the Velvet’s bold but transparent strategies, or by press speculation about the Warhol graphic being a “work for hire?”
Or, maybe MGM has secret plans prompted by questions from sites like Hollywood Reporter asking them questions about the graphic? How meta would that be?
Entry filed under: art/law, ARTIST NEWS, Gossip. Tags: Andy Warhol, Apple, art law, banana, Cat Weaver, copyright, copyright cat weaver, Eriq Gardner, Hollywood Reporter, intellectual property, IP, licensing, MGM, MGM records, rights, TAM, The Andy Warhol Foundation, The Art Machine, trademark, Universal Music Group, Velvet Underground.
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed